<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<ags:resources xmlns:ags="http://purl.org/agmes/1.1/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:agls="http://www.naa.gov.au/recordkeeping/gov_online/agls/1.2" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/">
<ags:resource>
					<dc:title><![CDATA[-]]></dc:title>
					<dc:creator>
					<ags:creatorPersonal><![CDATA[امیدی, دکتر جلیل]]></ags:creatorPersonal>

			</dc:creator>
			<dc:publisher>
				<ags:publisherName><![CDATA[دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران]]></ags:publisherName>
			</dc:publisher>
			<dc:date><dcterms:dateIssued><![CDATA[1999]]></dcterms:dateIssued></dc:date>
			<dc:description>
				<ags:descriptionNotes><![CDATA[Includes references]]></ags:descriptionNotes>
				<dcterms:abstract><![CDATA[Despite the sorry state of Human Rights in the world today and present limits and promises, criminal procedure must be considered as central and fundamental aspects of these rights. This is seen by numerous provisions about individual rights in UDHR and other documents of Human Rights. This article
discnsses the issue in an American view and summarizes criminal
procedure through twelve principles: fair. hearing, public hearing, independence and impartiality of the court, speedy trial, presumption of innocence, notice adequate time and facilities, 
assistance of counsel, examination of witnesses, assistance of an interpreter, tring in one's presence and right to appeal.]]></dcterms:abstract>
			</dc:description>
            <dc:identifier scheme="dcterms:URI"><![CDATA[https://jflps.ut.ac.ir/article_12569_7c794f3b7858734f2c92c073cd1a01da.pdf]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:identifier scheme="ags:DOI"><![CDATA[]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:type><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></dc:type>
			<dc:format><dcterms:medium><![CDATA[text]]></dcterms:medium></dc:format>
			<dc:language><![CDATA[فارسی]]></dc:language>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[https://jflps.ut.ac.ir/]]></dc:source>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[Law & Political science]]></dc:source>
		</ags:resource>
<ags:resource>
					<dc:title><![CDATA[-]]></dc:title>
					<dc:creator>
					<ags:creatorPersonal><![CDATA[عرفانی, دکتر محمود]]></ags:creatorPersonal>

			</dc:creator>
			<dc:publisher>
				<ags:publisherName><![CDATA[دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران]]></ags:publisherName>
			</dc:publisher>
			<dc:date><dcterms:dateIssued><![CDATA[1999]]></dcterms:dateIssued></dc:date>
			<dc:description>
				<ags:descriptionNotes><![CDATA[Includes references]]></ags:descriptionNotes>
				<dcterms:abstract><![CDATA[-]]></dcterms:abstract>
			</dc:description>
            <dc:identifier scheme="dcterms:URI"><![CDATA[https://jflps.ut.ac.ir/article_12570_f8de960fea5e4e0f2706b5d7c182ea73.pdf]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:identifier scheme="ags:DOI"><![CDATA[]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:type><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></dc:type>
			<dc:format><dcterms:medium><![CDATA[text]]></dcterms:medium></dc:format>
			<dc:language><![CDATA[فارسی]]></dc:language>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[https://jflps.ut.ac.ir/]]></dc:source>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[Law & Political science]]></dc:source>
		</ags:resource>
<ags:resource>
					<dc:title><![CDATA[-]]></dc:title>
					<dc:creator>
					<ags:creatorPersonal><![CDATA[زاده, دکتر سید مرتضی قاسم]]></ags:creatorPersonal>

			</dc:creator>
			<dc:publisher>
				<ags:publisherName><![CDATA[دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران]]></ags:publisherName>
			</dc:publisher>
			<dc:date><dcterms:dateIssued><![CDATA[1999]]></dcterms:dateIssued></dc:date>
			<dc:description>
				<ags:descriptionNotes><![CDATA[Includes references]]></ags:descriptionNotes>
				<dcterms:abstract><![CDATA[]]></dcterms:abstract>
			</dc:description>
            <dc:identifier scheme="dcterms:URI"><![CDATA[https://jflps.ut.ac.ir/article_12571_17612f197fe86dbde37606478505d2bf.pdf]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:identifier scheme="ags:DOI"><![CDATA[]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:type><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></dc:type>
			<dc:format><dcterms:medium><![CDATA[text]]></dcterms:medium></dc:format>
			<dc:language><![CDATA[فارسی]]></dc:language>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[https://jflps.ut.ac.ir/]]></dc:source>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[Law & Political science]]></dc:source>
		</ags:resource>
<ags:resource>
					<dc:title><![CDATA[-]]></dc:title>
					<dc:creator>
					<ags:creatorPersonal><![CDATA[خدائی, دکتر عباسعلی کد]]></ags:creatorPersonal>

			</dc:creator>
			<dc:publisher>
				<ags:publisherName><![CDATA[دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران]]></ags:publisherName>
			</dc:publisher>
			<dc:date><dcterms:dateIssued><![CDATA[1999]]></dcterms:dateIssued></dc:date>
			<dc:description>
				<ags:descriptionNotes><![CDATA[Includes references]]></ags:descriptionNotes>
				<dcterms:abstract><![CDATA[The European Union, which has its roots in the 1950s by
































setting up the European Coal &amp; Steel Community (ECSC), was a tremendous movement for int_grity through regionalisation. The
awful economic and political position of Europe after the World War II pushed European politicians for a way of escape and in
doing so, the ECSC becallne the cornerstone. However, the question of its capacity and competence in international arena was a
Jnajor point to which Article 210 of the EC Treaty lately refereed. By growing the extent and structure of the European COJnmunities and then changing into the European Union the question of its legal
personality changed to a big dilelna. In this regard, the European court of justice again came on the front bench. of the problem in
order to resolve it. This paper discusses the efforts of ICl in general and the ECl in particular, to find out the solution.
After considering some cases and reviewing the relevant
opinions, the paper will come to this result th,at the EC has legal personality as it has explicitly Jnentioned in Article 210. But as regards the EU, its legal personality could only be iJnplicitly, as it is necessary for all international institutions, though the question
of the extent of such coJnpetence remain to be resolved by the ECl in future.]]></dcterms:abstract>
			</dc:description>
            <dc:identifier scheme="dcterms:URI"><![CDATA[https://jflps.ut.ac.ir/article_12572_782ae4349846c3f9994d50250a8bf63a.pdf]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:identifier scheme="ags:DOI"><![CDATA[]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:type><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></dc:type>
			<dc:format><dcterms:medium><![CDATA[text]]></dcterms:medium></dc:format>
			<dc:language><![CDATA[فارسی]]></dc:language>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[https://jflps.ut.ac.ir/]]></dc:source>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[Law & Political science]]></dc:source>
		</ags:resource>
<ags:resource>
					<dc:title><![CDATA[-]]></dc:title>
					<dc:creator>
					<ags:creatorPersonal><![CDATA[لطفی, دکتر اسدالله]]></ags:creatorPersonal>

			</dc:creator>
			<dc:publisher>
				<ags:publisherName><![CDATA[دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران]]></ags:publisherName>
			</dc:publisher>
			<dc:date><dcterms:dateIssued><![CDATA[1999]]></dcterms:dateIssued></dc:date>
			<dc:description>
				<ags:descriptionNotes><![CDATA[Includes references]]></ags:descriptionNotes>
				<dcterms:abstract><![CDATA[One of the religious principles, somehow related to legal and


































religious prospects, is the principle of "estilnan" or insecurity of the trustee; where by inevitable sanction resulted from poss.ession is deprived and the possessor is said to be untrust worthy. For example, the lesee in a lease contract. These individuals are to be
trusted, if not guilty for the defect or destruction of what is put at their disposal, they wi]] not be responsible for it. In the present
article, first, the definition and subdivisions of sanction "zaman" are given. Next, the concept of "estiman" (seeking trustee), its
reasons, purports, and its religious and legal consequences are mentioned. Then the silnilarities of the principle of "estiman",
"amanat" and its different kinds, and sanction provision in such contracts are discussed in detail. Quite often, religious issues are
compared with the civil code of Islamic Republic of Iran, or the laws relevant to the subject are explained. Furthermore, SOBle problems concerning the insecurity of the trustee have been offered and explained.]]></dcterms:abstract>
			</dc:description>
            <dc:identifier scheme="dcterms:URI"><![CDATA[https://jflps.ut.ac.ir/article_12573_a32fec620fadb620352bcb51f7eb9e84.pdf]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:identifier scheme="ags:DOI"><![CDATA[]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:type><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></dc:type>
			<dc:format><dcterms:medium><![CDATA[text]]></dcterms:medium></dc:format>
			<dc:language><![CDATA[فارسی]]></dc:language>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[https://jflps.ut.ac.ir/]]></dc:source>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[Law & Political science]]></dc:source>
		</ags:resource>
<ags:resource>
					<dc:title><![CDATA[-]]></dc:title>
					<dc:creator>
					<ags:creatorPersonal><![CDATA[غمامی, مبحثی]]></ags:creatorPersonal>

			</dc:creator>
			<dc:publisher>
				<ags:publisherName><![CDATA[دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران]]></ags:publisherName>
			</dc:publisher>
			<dc:date><dcterms:dateIssued><![CDATA[1999]]></dcterms:dateIssued></dc:date>
			<dc:description>
				<ags:descriptionNotes><![CDATA[Includes references]]></ags:descriptionNotes>
				<dcterms:abstract><![CDATA[Bank guarantees have often-though not -always-a different
meanIng frolli traditional contract of guarantee; it Ineans a primary and independent undertaking by the guarantor to pay if
the conditions of the guarantee are satisfied. In the words of SOllie
English judges, the word "guarantee" in this expression is often used in other than its legal sense, it simply means "undertaking".
This essay, as the main aiIn, analizes the characteristics, and SOine practical problems resulting from abuse of bank gurantees.]]></dcterms:abstract>
			</dc:description>
            <dc:identifier scheme="dcterms:URI"><![CDATA[https://jflps.ut.ac.ir/article_12574_6ac9c90ea45b4ab04e67be1608402731.pdf]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:identifier scheme="ags:DOI"><![CDATA[]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:type><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></dc:type>
			<dc:format><dcterms:medium><![CDATA[text]]></dcterms:medium></dc:format>
			<dc:language><![CDATA[فارسی]]></dc:language>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[https://jflps.ut.ac.ir/]]></dc:source>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[Law & Political science]]></dc:source>
		</ags:resource>
<ags:resource>
					<dc:title><![CDATA[-]]></dc:title>
					<dc:creator>
					<ags:creatorPersonal><![CDATA[علمداری, دکتر جهانگیر معینی]]></ags:creatorPersonal>

			</dc:creator>
			<dc:publisher>
				<ags:publisherName><![CDATA[دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران]]></ags:publisherName>
			</dc:publisher>
			<dc:date><dcterms:dateIssued><![CDATA[1999]]></dcterms:dateIssued></dc:date>
			<dc:description>
				<ags:descriptionNotes><![CDATA[Includes references]]></ags:descriptionNotes>
				<dcterms:abstract><![CDATA[Those who reject the public interest and other theories about collective interests, usually, argue about the danger of violating personal freedoms. For them strengthening and development of private interests is a precondition for liberty. This article criticizes
this point of view and speaks about the necessity of having a theory about public interest. In this context, two related propositions have been discussed. Firstly, public interest theory, essentially, is not in contradiction with individual's freedom and
does not break his or her status in society. Of course, some extremist theorists of interest do that; but these are exceptional. In spite of this, it is possible to formulate a concrete theory on public interest that in which individual freedom have been observe9. Secondly, the author believes that a developed
conception of liberty closely relates to common interest.]]></dcterms:abstract>
			</dc:description>
            <dc:identifier scheme="dcterms:URI"><![CDATA[https://jflps.ut.ac.ir/article_12575_eebe9709cd1fe6a432107fd7dd0d1368.pdf]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:identifier scheme="ags:DOI"><![CDATA[]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:type><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></dc:type>
			<dc:format><dcterms:medium><![CDATA[text]]></dcterms:medium></dc:format>
			<dc:language><![CDATA[فارسی]]></dc:language>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[https://jflps.ut.ac.ir/]]></dc:source>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[Law & Political science]]></dc:source>
		</ags:resource>
<ags:resource>
					<dc:title><![CDATA[-]]></dc:title>
					<dc:creator>
					<ags:creatorPersonal><![CDATA[unknown, ]]></ags:creatorPersonal>

			</dc:creator>
			<dc:publisher>
				<ags:publisherName><![CDATA[دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران]]></ags:publisherName>
			</dc:publisher>
			<dc:date><dcterms:dateIssued><![CDATA[1999]]></dcterms:dateIssued></dc:date>
			<dc:description>
				<ags:descriptionNotes><![CDATA[Includes references]]></ags:descriptionNotes>
				<dcterms:abstract><![CDATA[-]]></dcterms:abstract>
			</dc:description>
            <dc:identifier scheme="dcterms:URI"><![CDATA[https://jflps.ut.ac.ir/article_12576_394a328ab34d0ac5a73bed9c562bc948.pdf]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:identifier scheme="ags:DOI"><![CDATA[]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:type><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></dc:type>
			<dc:format><dcterms:medium><![CDATA[text]]></dcterms:medium></dc:format>
			<dc:language><![CDATA[فارسی]]></dc:language>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[https://jflps.ut.ac.ir/]]></dc:source>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[Law & Political science]]></dc:source>
		</ags:resource>

</ags:resources>