<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<ags:resources xmlns:ags="http://purl.org/agmes/1.1/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:agls="http://www.naa.gov.au/recordkeeping/gov_online/agls/1.2" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/">
<ags:resource>
					<dc:title><![CDATA[THE ROLE OF MARINE INSURANCE IN MAKING -GOOD
COLLISION OF SHIPS DAMAGES]]></dc:title>
					<dc:creator>
					<ags:creatorPersonal><![CDATA[ابوعطا, دکتر محمد]]></ags:creatorPersonal>

			</dc:creator>
			<dc:publisher>
				<ags:publisherName><![CDATA[دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران]]></ags:publisherName>
			</dc:publisher>
			<dc:date><dcterms:dateIssued><![CDATA[2006]]></dcterms:dateIssued></dc:date>
			<dc:description>
				<ags:descriptionNotes><![CDATA[Includes references]]></ags:descriptionNotes>
				<dcterms:abstract><![CDATA[The significant role of insurance in making good the damages
arising from different incidents menacing human being is compeletly
clear. Particularly that, in some areas, in conclusion of rapid
development of science and technology and complication of facilities
and relations, it appears necessary to protect injured persons against
financial consequences resulting from diverse accidents.
In this Connection, marine insurance is one of main fields .of
commercial insurance activity because heavy losses of various
navigation incidents has made it unavoidable for ship and cargo
owners to provide for insurance covers.
This research has been allocated to study the considerable site of
marine insurance in compensating the damages resulting from one of
formidable maritim accidents naming collision of ships.]]></dcterms:abstract>
			</dc:description>
            <dc:identifier scheme="dcterms:URI"><![CDATA[https://jflps.ut.ac.ir/article_25172_6dc0cd88fed6a26563e22587956f4f79.pdf]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:identifier scheme="ags:DOI"><![CDATA[]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:type><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></dc:type>
			<dc:format><dcterms:medium><![CDATA[text]]></dcterms:medium></dc:format>
			<dc:language><![CDATA[فارسی]]></dc:language>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[https://jflps.ut.ac.ir/]]></dc:source>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[Law & Political science]]></dc:source>
		</ags:resource>
<ags:resource>
					<dc:title><![CDATA[THE LEASE OF LACKING PERIOD]]></dc:title>
					<dc:creator>
					<ags:creatorPersonal><![CDATA[پناه, دکتر علی اسلامی]]></ags:creatorPersonal>
<ags:creatorPersonal><![CDATA[کریمی, هادی]]></ags:creatorPersonal>

			</dc:creator>
			<dc:publisher>
				<ags:publisherName><![CDATA[دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران]]></ags:publisherName>
			</dc:publisher>
			<dc:date><dcterms:dateIssued><![CDATA[2006]]></dcterms:dateIssued></dc:date>
			<dc:description>
				<ags:descriptionNotes><![CDATA[Includes references]]></ags:descriptionNotes>
				<dcterms:abstract><![CDATA[The two parts of a lease contract cannot always assign the period
of lease. Sometimes it isn't mentioned any period in contract but they
assert the smallest unit of time for assignment of the rental. Therefore
the civil low makes reputable the lease contracts that the period of rent
is left unsaid in them for the same smallest unit of time. In 'spite of that
the legal spirit of this agreement isn't so distinct to accredit the
contracts lacking of period.
In this paper it has been tried to study such contracts and at same
times the legal spirit of these agreement has been investigated]]></dcterms:abstract>
			</dc:description>
            <dc:identifier scheme="dcterms:URI"><![CDATA[https://jflps.ut.ac.ir/article_25173_9b4a2a5e3148b0bb7d321fbcda7e5b47.pdf]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:identifier scheme="ags:DOI"><![CDATA[]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:type><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></dc:type>
			<dc:format><dcterms:medium><![CDATA[text]]></dcterms:medium></dc:format>
			<dc:language><![CDATA[فارسی]]></dc:language>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[https://jflps.ut.ac.ir/]]></dc:source>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[Law & Political science]]></dc:source>
		</ags:resource>
<ags:resource>
					<dc:title><![CDATA[LES CAS D'EXONERATION DE LA
RESPONSABILITE CONTRACTUELLE DANS LA
CONVENTION DE VENTE INTERNATIONAL ET
EN DROIT COMPARE]]></dc:title>
					<dc:creator>
					<ags:creatorPersonal><![CDATA[جهرمی, دکتر منوچهر توسلی]]></ags:creatorPersonal>

			</dc:creator>
			<dc:publisher>
				<ags:publisherName><![CDATA[دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران]]></ags:publisherName>
			</dc:publisher>
			<dc:date><dcterms:dateIssued><![CDATA[2006]]></dcterms:dateIssued></dc:date>
			<dc:description>
				<ags:descriptionNotes><![CDATA[Includes references]]></ags:descriptionNotes>
				<dcterms:abstract><![CDATA[Dans la plupart des cas, la reponse des differents systemes
juridiques aux questions juridiques est identique ou rapprochee. Ceci
se justifie, sans doute, par le fait que la raison humaine ala recherche
de solutions pour les problemes juridique arrive aux memes resultants,
meme si ceux s'expriment differemment,
La derogation au principe pacta sunt servanda sous certaines
conditions en est un exemple qui est accordee par tous, mais
differemment exprimee,
Le present article est consacre a l'examen des cas de derogation dudit
principe en traitant d'abord la question dans les systemes juridiques
anglais, francais et iranien, ensuite dans la convention de vente
intemationale.]]></dcterms:abstract>
			</dc:description>
            <dc:identifier scheme="dcterms:URI"><![CDATA[https://jflps.ut.ac.ir/article_25174_b0902e0aea0a868929844c13c8466acf.pdf]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:identifier scheme="ags:DOI"><![CDATA[]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:type><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></dc:type>
			<dc:format><dcterms:medium><![CDATA[text]]></dcterms:medium></dc:format>
			<dc:language><![CDATA[فارسی]]></dc:language>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[https://jflps.ut.ac.ir/]]></dc:source>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[Law & Political science]]></dc:source>
		</ags:resource>
<ags:resource>
					<dc:title><![CDATA[THE HISTORY OF REDUCING THE CONCEPT OF
RIGHT FROM JUSTICE TO OWNERSHIP]]></dc:title>
					<dc:creator>
					<ags:creatorPersonal><![CDATA[تبار, دکتر حسن جعفری]]></ags:creatorPersonal>

			</dc:creator>
			<dc:publisher>
				<ags:publisherName><![CDATA[دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران]]></ags:publisherName>
			</dc:publisher>
			<dc:date><dcterms:dateIssued><![CDATA[2006]]></dcterms:dateIssued></dc:date>
			<dc:description>
				<ags:descriptionNotes><![CDATA[Includes references]]></ags:descriptionNotes>
				<dcterms:abstract><![CDATA[This essay recognizes three historical concepts for hagh (=right):
1. Right as truth and justice: There is no difference Here between
theoretical and practical reasoning and everything which is
beautiful or corresponds to the reality is "right" . The good or
beautiful act is exactly a priori (=natural =human) rights. This
concept of right is not born by the will of governmental
authouities.
2. Right as power and profit: according to this concept, arising
from the authority of the state, the right is a privilege rather
than right, and the authority may decide to abate this right as
he has already decided to give this privilege to the citizens.
3. Right as property: the concept of right has gradually been
reduced to the most obvious meaning of profit which is the
private property. We can trace this concept in the thories of
John Lock and Robert Nozick who define justice somehow by
ownership, and the theory of traditional Islamic jurisprudence
which introduces the right as a weak level of the ownewrship.]]></dcterms:abstract>
			</dc:description>
            <dc:identifier scheme="dcterms:URI"><![CDATA[https://jflps.ut.ac.ir/article_25175_62555e7fde5d51085a98a0d7a767a574.pdf]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:identifier scheme="ags:DOI"><![CDATA[]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:type><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></dc:type>
			<dc:format><dcterms:medium><![CDATA[text]]></dcterms:medium></dc:format>
			<dc:language><![CDATA[فارسی]]></dc:language>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[https://jflps.ut.ac.ir/]]></dc:source>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[Law & Political science]]></dc:source>
		</ags:resource>
<ags:resource>
					<dc:title><![CDATA[PROTECTION OF TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE
AS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS]]></dc:title>
					<dc:creator>
					<ags:creatorPersonal><![CDATA[حبیبا, دکتر سعید]]></ags:creatorPersonal>
<ags:creatorPersonal><![CDATA[معتمدی, غلامحسین]]></ags:creatorPersonal>

			</dc:creator>
			<dc:publisher>
				<ags:publisherName><![CDATA[دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران]]></ags:publisherName>
			</dc:publisher>
			<dc:date><dcterms:dateIssued><![CDATA[2006]]></dcterms:dateIssued></dc:date>
			<dc:description>
				<ags:descriptionNotes><![CDATA[Includes references]]></ags:descriptionNotes>
				<dcterms:abstract><![CDATA[Traditional knowledge is commercialized without due respect for the
cultural and economic interests of the communities in which it
originates. At the same time, and often, no share of the returns from its
exploitation is conceded to the communities, which have developed
and maintained it.
Today, traditional knowledge is valuable economic and cultural assets
within the global information society.
In a number of developing countries, traditional knowledge is rich and
diverse sources of creativity and innovation. Further, the traditional
knowledge systems are frameworks for continuing creativity and
innovation in most fields of technology ranging from traditional
medicine to traditional agriculture practices, and extending to design.
Traditional knowledge is considered by its holder as a constantly
renewed source of wealth, both as an economic asset and as cultural
patrimony.
Interestingly, intellectual property issues related to traditional
knowledge often cut across the conventional branches of intellectual
property law, such as industrial property and copyright.
In order to help better understanding and wider consensus, it seems
necessary to address basic conceptual problems and test practical
solutions to the protection of traditional knowledge.]]></dcterms:abstract>
			</dc:description>
            <dc:identifier scheme="dcterms:URI"><![CDATA[https://jflps.ut.ac.ir/article_25176_67e313322555f58093a5fdb5d7aca889.pdf]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:identifier scheme="ags:DOI"><![CDATA[]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:type><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></dc:type>
			<dc:format><dcterms:medium><![CDATA[text]]></dcterms:medium></dc:format>
			<dc:language><![CDATA[فارسی]]></dc:language>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[https://jflps.ut.ac.ir/]]></dc:source>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[Law & Political science]]></dc:source>
		</ags:resource>
<ags:resource>
					<dc:title><![CDATA[PROCEEDS OF CRIME AND REVERSE ONUS]]></dc:title>
					<dc:creator>
					<ags:creatorPersonal><![CDATA[رحمدل, دکتر منصور]]></ags:creatorPersonal>

			</dc:creator>
			<dc:publisher>
				<ags:publisherName><![CDATA[دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران]]></ags:publisherName>
			</dc:publisher>
			<dc:date><dcterms:dateIssued><![CDATA[2006]]></dcterms:dateIssued></dc:date>
			<dc:description>
				<ags:descriptionNotes><![CDATA[Includes references]]></ags:descriptionNotes>
				<dcterms:abstract><![CDATA[There is a general rule in criminal law, Principal of Innocence.
According to this rule, who asserts must prove. If she succeeds, ,this
principal is replaced by pricipal of criminality, (as this pricipal is valid
as far as the contrary is not proven). So, it is Clear that the validity of
this pricipal is based on the circumstances and reasonable inferences
from these circumstances. If the situation and circumstances is against
the accused, the burden of proof is reversed .. The legislator that
according to the circumstances regards the accused innocent, reverses
the burden of proof according to the reversed circumstances and
requires the accused to prove the contrary or disprove the prosecutor's
claims. In the present paper, we consider the situation regarding the
proceeds of crime.]]></dcterms:abstract>
			</dc:description>
            <dc:identifier scheme="dcterms:URI"><![CDATA[https://jflps.ut.ac.ir/article_25177_f85c538620f0c7c113a503731507a95b.pdf]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:identifier scheme="ags:DOI"><![CDATA[]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:type><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></dc:type>
			<dc:format><dcterms:medium><![CDATA[text]]></dcterms:medium></dc:format>
			<dc:language><![CDATA[فارسی]]></dc:language>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[https://jflps.ut.ac.ir/]]></dc:source>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[Law & Political science]]></dc:source>
		</ags:resource>
<ags:resource>
					<dc:title><![CDATA[THE PRINCIPLE OF THE "MORE •FAVORABLE
PROVISION" AS THE RULE FOR RESOLVING
CONFLICTS BETWEEN HUMAN RIGHTS TREATIES]]></dc:title>
					<dc:creator>
					<ags:creatorPersonal><![CDATA[اخوی, دکتر سید علی سادات]]></ags:creatorPersonal>

			</dc:creator>
			<dc:publisher>
				<ags:publisherName><![CDATA[دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران]]></ags:publisherName>
			</dc:publisher>
			<dc:date><dcterms:dateIssued><![CDATA[2006]]></dcterms:dateIssued></dc:date>
			<dc:description>
				<ags:descriptionNotes><![CDATA[Includes references]]></ags:descriptionNotes>
				<dcterms:abstract><![CDATA[Article 30 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties lays
down general rules for resolving conflicts between treaties. The said
Article does rules to be applied to all treaties. Subsequent to the
adoption of the Vienna Convention, some scholars suggested that the
provisions of Article 30 were not appropriate for resolving conflicts
between human rights treaties and, therefore, a special rule was
needed. The rule dvanced in this regard was the principle of the "more
favorable provision". The present article attempts to describe the
content of this principle and to evaluate its practial significance]]></dcterms:abstract>
			</dc:description>
            <dc:identifier scheme="dcterms:URI"><![CDATA[https://jflps.ut.ac.ir/article_25178_06c86b19464187f878463e405ee2733f.pdf]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:identifier scheme="ags:DOI"><![CDATA[]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:type><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></dc:type>
			<dc:format><dcterms:medium><![CDATA[text]]></dcterms:medium></dc:format>
			<dc:language><![CDATA[فارسی]]></dc:language>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[https://jflps.ut.ac.ir/]]></dc:source>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[Law & Political science]]></dc:source>
		</ags:resource>
<ags:resource>
					<dc:title><![CDATA[THE ESCROW AGREEMENTS IN CUMPUTER
PROGRAMS LICENSE CONTRACTS]]></dc:title>
					<dc:creator>
					<ags:creatorPersonal><![CDATA[نشاط, دکتر امیرصادقی]]></ags:creatorPersonal>

			</dc:creator>
			<dc:publisher>
				<ags:publisherName><![CDATA[دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران]]></ags:publisherName>
			</dc:publisher>
			<dc:date><dcterms:dateIssued><![CDATA[2006]]></dcterms:dateIssued></dc:date>
			<dc:description>
				<ags:descriptionNotes><![CDATA[Includes references]]></ags:descriptionNotes>
				<dcterms:abstract><![CDATA[The software license agreements form. Nowadays. a large portion of
international transactions.
Meanwhile. the Escrow Agreements are usually as an important part
of these contracts without which they could not be entered Into.
The Escrow Agreement is a three dimensions contract and formed by
three parties jointly.
Which side is the offering or accepting party and whether could two
parties jointly be considered as the offering or accepting side?
This article tries to explain the both usefulness and structure of these
Agreements and to answer the question as mentioned above.]]></dcterms:abstract>
			</dc:description>
            <dc:identifier scheme="dcterms:URI"><![CDATA[https://jflps.ut.ac.ir/article_25179_288b12423246f0e4d65733c407dd83cd.pdf]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:identifier scheme="ags:DOI"><![CDATA[]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:type><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></dc:type>
			<dc:format><dcterms:medium><![CDATA[text]]></dcterms:medium></dc:format>
			<dc:language><![CDATA[فارسی]]></dc:language>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[https://jflps.ut.ac.ir/]]></dc:source>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[Law & Political science]]></dc:source>
		</ags:resource>
<ags:resource>
					<dc:title><![CDATA[A GLANCE AT THE CIVIL LIABITY OF JUDICIAL
DECISIONER]]></dc:title>
					<dc:creator>
					<ags:creatorPersonal><![CDATA[مازندرانی, دکتر محمد صالحی]]></ags:creatorPersonal>

			</dc:creator>
			<dc:publisher>
				<ags:publisherName><![CDATA[دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران]]></ags:publisherName>
			</dc:publisher>
			<dc:date><dcterms:dateIssued><![CDATA[2006]]></dcterms:dateIssued></dc:date>
			<dc:description>
				<ags:descriptionNotes><![CDATA[Includes references]]></ags:descriptionNotes>
				<dcterms:abstract><![CDATA[The judiciary is a branch of wilayah (guardian ship).
In where it has the highest value and position.
And the gravest responsibility. All brancehes of wilayah are valid so
long as they could implement their proper goals, Islam regards a judge
not as amere employees or public servants acting in a specified way,
rather, it views them as a guardians and executor of justice, whose be
havior is based on the principle of the rightness and a higher morality.
In other words, the main principle of judgment is the implementation
of justice, and the enforcement of rights.
There fore, where a judgment does not implement such an aim, it
would be invalid, and the judge would be responsible for its effects .]]></dcterms:abstract>
			</dc:description>
            <dc:identifier scheme="dcterms:URI"><![CDATA[https://jflps.ut.ac.ir/article_25180_d124e683cdb3b45d4a03d83465e29e3b.pdf]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:identifier scheme="ags:DOI"><![CDATA[]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:type><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></dc:type>
			<dc:format><dcterms:medium><![CDATA[text]]></dcterms:medium></dc:format>
			<dc:language><![CDATA[فارسی]]></dc:language>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[https://jflps.ut.ac.ir/]]></dc:source>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[Law & Political science]]></dc:source>
		</ags:resource>
<ags:resource>
					<dc:title><![CDATA[LA PRIMAUTE DE LA LOI ET LA SOCIETE CIVILE]]></dc:title>
					<dc:creator>
					<ags:creatorPersonal><![CDATA[کاتوزیان, دکتر ناصر]]></ags:creatorPersonal>

			</dc:creator>
			<dc:publisher>
				<ags:publisherName><![CDATA[دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران]]></ags:publisherName>
			</dc:publisher>
			<dc:date><dcterms:dateIssued><![CDATA[2006]]></dcterms:dateIssued></dc:date>
			<dc:description>
				<ags:descriptionNotes><![CDATA[Includes references]]></ags:descriptionNotes>
				<dcterms:abstract><![CDATA[Il'y a une unanirnite a admettre l'exigence de la souverainte de la loi
et son role primordial dans la formation de la societe civile: Les
inividualistes, les ponseurs socialistes, ainsi que les autocrats sont
d'accord sur le sujet de la primaute et la force obligatiore de la loi.
C'est ainsi qu'on expliquela violence a la loisous le pretexte de
"necessite'iet de "Securite".
Neanmoins le culte excessive dela loi et les exces de l'interpretation
exclusivement attachee ala loi ecrite est aussi dangereuse et abusive .
car, comme toute oeuvre humaine, la loi est forcemeat incomplete.
F. Geny a bien voulu declarer que"... la legislation, codifie ou non,
reste irnpuissante afoumir, aelle seul toutes les solutions qui requiert
l'order juridique" (Methode d'interpretation. T.Lno.51).
L'un des inconvenients Ie plus dangereux de la conception abusive de
la loi, comme la source complete et exclusive de l'ordre juridique
deverait adrninistrer aussi la vie privee des individus et pourrait etre
une restriction embarassante et inopportune de la libertee de penser et
de la delarer.]]></dcterms:abstract>
			</dc:description>
            <dc:identifier scheme="dcterms:URI"><![CDATA[https://jflps.ut.ac.ir/article_25181_cde476582572fc06c8ab0a3a7d43c3c1.pdf]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:identifier scheme="ags:DOI"><![CDATA[]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:type><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></dc:type>
			<dc:format><dcterms:medium><![CDATA[text]]></dcterms:medium></dc:format>
			<dc:language><![CDATA[فارسی]]></dc:language>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[https://jflps.ut.ac.ir/]]></dc:source>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[Law & Political science]]></dc:source>
		</ags:resource>
<ags:resource>
					<dc:title><![CDATA[LES ELEMNTS CONSTITUTIFS DES
INFREZETIONS CONRE LES BIENS ET LA
PROPRIETE, ET LEURS MODES COMMUS ET
DISTINCTS DANS LEUR RAPPORTS AVEE LES
DEVOIRS DU MINISTERE PUBLIC]]></dc:title>
					<dc:creator>
					<ags:creatorPersonal><![CDATA[گلدوزیان, دکتر ایرج]]></ags:creatorPersonal>

			</dc:creator>
			<dc:publisher>
				<ags:publisherName><![CDATA[دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران]]></ags:publisherName>
			</dc:publisher>
			<dc:date><dcterms:dateIssued><![CDATA[2006]]></dcterms:dateIssued></dc:date>
			<dc:description>
				<ags:descriptionNotes><![CDATA[Includes references]]></ags:descriptionNotes>
				<dcterms:abstract><![CDATA[Lrsqu'il s'agit d'un probleeme d'ordre juridique, certains
plaignants essayent de se montrer comme la victime d'une infraction
penale, Ce genre de plaignants vaulent protiter des facilites accordees
dans les affairens penales (com mea l'administration de la prevue, la
charge reduite, et Ia duree convenable de la procedure). Par
consequent, l'article publie explique les modes communs et distincts
des differentes infractions contreles biens et la propriete; et la
distinction des affaires penales des afaires civiles et juridiques.]]></dcterms:abstract>
			</dc:description>
            <dc:identifier scheme="dcterms:URI"><![CDATA[https://jflps.ut.ac.ir/article_25182_a097ec5a7fb825adb07529d3b5e159a5.pdf]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:identifier scheme="ags:DOI"><![CDATA[]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:type><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></dc:type>
			<dc:format><dcterms:medium><![CDATA[text]]></dcterms:medium></dc:format>
			<dc:language><![CDATA[فارسی]]></dc:language>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[https://jflps.ut.ac.ir/]]></dc:source>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[Law & Political science]]></dc:source>
		</ags:resource>
<ags:resource>
					<dc:title><![CDATA[ANTICIPATORY SELF DEFENSE IN INTERNATIONAL LAW]]></dc:title>
					<dc:creator>
					<ags:creatorPersonal><![CDATA[موسوی, دکتر سید فضل الله]]></ags:creatorPersonal>
<ags:creatorPersonal><![CDATA[حاتمی, مهدی]]></ags:creatorPersonal>

			</dc:creator>
			<dc:publisher>
				<ags:publisherName><![CDATA[دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران]]></ags:publisherName>
			</dc:publisher>
			<dc:date><dcterms:dateIssued><![CDATA[2006]]></dcterms:dateIssued></dc:date>
			<dc:description>
				<ags:descriptionNotes><![CDATA[Includes references]]></ags:descriptionNotes>
				<dcterms:abstract><![CDATA[After 11 September attack, anticipatory self defense has obtained
specific situation in the doctrine ,of western States. These countries
with financial and military power are seeking to justify this doctrine.
This type of defense is contrary to article 51 of the Charter of United
Nations that expresses the concept of self defense. In this paper, the
authors are going to verify and show that this doctrine can not find
legitimate situation in Opinio juris of .member States 'of international
community. Reports of the United Nations secretary general and
judgments of international court of justice support this conclusion.
However it seems that the verification of this doctrine can show its
critiques.]]></dcterms:abstract>
			</dc:description>
            <dc:identifier scheme="dcterms:URI"><![CDATA[https://jflps.ut.ac.ir/article_25183_6ab21a270262e772ea98e3a5e18fb759.pdf]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:identifier scheme="ags:DOI"><![CDATA[]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:type><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></dc:type>
			<dc:format><dcterms:medium><![CDATA[text]]></dcterms:medium></dc:format>
			<dc:language><![CDATA[فارسی]]></dc:language>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[https://jflps.ut.ac.ir/]]></dc:source>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[Law & Political science]]></dc:source>
		</ags:resource>
<ags:resource>
					<dc:title><![CDATA[THE STUDY OF PROMPT RELEASE OFFORREIGN
DETAINED VESSELS BASED ONUN CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF THE SEA, THEDECISIONS OF INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL OF THE LAW OF THE SEA (ITLOS) AND INTERNAL LAW OF IRAN]]></dc:title>
					<dc:creator>
					<ags:creatorPersonal><![CDATA[نوری, علی عبداله حبیب]]></ags:creatorPersonal>

			</dc:creator>
			<dc:publisher>
				<ags:publisherName><![CDATA[دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران]]></ags:publisherName>
			</dc:publisher>
			<dc:date><dcterms:dateIssued><![CDATA[2006]]></dcterms:dateIssued></dc:date>
			<dc:description>
				<ags:descriptionNotes><![CDATA[Includes references]]></ags:descriptionNotes>
				<dcterms:abstract><![CDATA[Right to detain any vessel is granted to the coastal states by UN
Convention in the Law of the Sea (1982). On the contrary, the right to
put forward an application for the prompt release is granted to the flag
states . This matter can also be found in the General Principals of Law.
Therefore not only the members of the convention are committed to
abide by but also each country is obliged to do so. In this line some
cases were raised to International Tribunal of the Law of the Sea
(ITLOS) and decisions were made. The present paper is an attempt to
study the different aspects of such prompt release and its securities
based on the 1982 convention, ITLOSs decisions and General
principals of law. The obtained result can be applied to the next cases
of ITLOS and countries future relations .
At last, the terms of prompt release and reasonable bond are
brought to light in short based on Iranian internal law in relation
to the International law.]]></dcterms:abstract>
			</dc:description>
            <dc:identifier scheme="dcterms:URI"><![CDATA[https://jflps.ut.ac.ir/article_25184_ed927e66ef974610fe3823e3d939a8da.pdf]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:identifier scheme="ags:DOI"><![CDATA[]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:type><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></dc:type>
			<dc:format><dcterms:medium><![CDATA[text]]></dcterms:medium></dc:format>
			<dc:language><![CDATA[فارسی]]></dc:language>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[https://jflps.ut.ac.ir/]]></dc:source>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[Law & Political science]]></dc:source>
		</ags:resource>
<ags:resource>
					<dc:title><![CDATA[-]]></dc:title>
					<dc:creator>
					<ags:creatorPersonal><![CDATA[کاتوزیان, دکتر ناصر]]></ags:creatorPersonal>

			</dc:creator>
			<dc:publisher>
				<ags:publisherName><![CDATA[دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران]]></ags:publisherName>
			</dc:publisher>
			<dc:date><dcterms:dateIssued><![CDATA[2006]]></dcterms:dateIssued></dc:date>
			<dc:description>
				<ags:descriptionNotes><![CDATA[Includes references]]></ags:descriptionNotes>
				<dcterms:abstract><![CDATA[-]]></dcterms:abstract>
			</dc:description>
            <dc:identifier scheme="dcterms:URI"><![CDATA[https://jflps.ut.ac.ir/article_25185_72c2e46dc258a4f0857e3463810e17a6.pdf]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:identifier scheme="ags:DOI"><![CDATA[]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:type><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></dc:type>
			<dc:format><dcterms:medium><![CDATA[text]]></dcterms:medium></dc:format>
			<dc:language><![CDATA[فارسی]]></dc:language>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[https://jflps.ut.ac.ir/]]></dc:source>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[Law & Political science]]></dc:source>
		</ags:resource>

</ags:resources>