THE PRINCIPLE OF THE "MORE •FAVORABLE
PROVISION" AS THE RULE FOR RESOLVING
CONFLICTS BETWEEN HUMAN RIGHTS TREATIES
Abstract
Article 30 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties lays
down general rules for resolving conflicts between treaties. The said
Article does rules to be applied to all treaties. Subsequent to the
adoption of the Vienna Convention, some scholars suggested that the
provisions of Article 30 were not appropriate for resolving conflicts
between human rights treaties and, therefore, a special rule was
needed. The rule dvanced in this regard was the principle of the "more
favorable provision". The present article attempts to describe the
content of this principle and to evaluate its practial significance
(2006). THE PRINCIPLE OF THE "MORE •FAVORABLE
PROVISION" AS THE RULE FOR RESOLVING
CONFLICTS BETWEEN HUMAN RIGHTS TREATIES. Law & Political science, 72(0), -.
MLA
. "THE PRINCIPLE OF THE "MORE •FAVORABLE
PROVISION" AS THE RULE FOR RESOLVING
CONFLICTS BETWEEN HUMAN RIGHTS TREATIES". Law & Political science, 72, 0, 2006, -.
HARVARD
(2006). 'THE PRINCIPLE OF THE "MORE •FAVORABLE
PROVISION" AS THE RULE FOR RESOLVING
CONFLICTS BETWEEN HUMAN RIGHTS TREATIES', Law & Political science, 72(0), pp. -.
VANCOUVER
THE PRINCIPLE OF THE "MORE •FAVORABLE
PROVISION" AS THE RULE FOR RESOLVING
CONFLICTS BETWEEN HUMAN RIGHTS TREATIES. Law & Political science, 2006; 72(0): -.
)